Sources said that the data protection and human rights laws had been breached.
A man from Cardiff, UK, claimed that the police breached his human rights when the police used facial recognition technology for a case, but court today ruled that the police’s actions were lawful. That is, however, to be noted is not the end of this matter, hardly the end of the matter.
South Wales Police has been trialling automated facial recognition since April 2017. Different powers around the nation are trying comparable Systems, including London’s Metropolitan Police
The man, Ed Bridges, may have been snapped shopping during a pilot plan called AFR Locate. This included taking photos of individuals’ appearances from live CCTV feeds and preparing them continuously to remove biometric data. If a face recognization system coordinated a database of individuals on the police watch list, they would be hailed. Something else, the information was erased right away. The power utilized this innovation around multiple times at open occasions between May 2017 and April 2019, including at football matches and shows. An expected 500,000 countenances were examined.
At the consultation, it developed that the police couldn’t presently check whether pictures of Bridges had been taken. On the off chance that they had been, his photos would have been erased.
“It can be used for really noble and well-meaning ends, but it can also be used maliciously, and it can also be used for well-intended purposes that have very serious social consequences” — Karen Yeung, University of Birmingham Law professor
Responding to the decision, Britain’s Information Commissioner’s Office cautioned about the dangers of conveying an innovation which it named “meddlesome” and which has the potential, “whenever utilized without the correct security shields, to undermine as opposed to improve trust in the police.”
The watchdog included that it would consider the court’s discoveries when planning new direction for police following the finish of an examination concerning police utilization of facial acknowledgement.
Makers of AFR has acknowledged its capability to improve open wellbeing. Former U.K. Home Secretary Sajid Javid alluded to the innovation as “game-changing” in the battle against youngster abusers, as did Chris Phillips, the previous leader of the National Counter Terrorism Security Office.
“It can be used for really noble and well-meaning ends, but it can also be used maliciously, and it can also be used for well-intended purposes that have very serious social consequences,” said Karen Yeung, a University of Birmingham Law professor and AI expert.
How this technology is going to take a tool in our life is yet to be explored.
Let us know your views on the use of Facial Recognization to be used by Government/Police in our country?